AUTOBODY DIRECTORY
Home › Guides › Who Pays for the Training Gate

Who Pays for the Training Gate

Short answer: Your shop is telling you the truth. Two manufacturers make an I-CAR credential a written condition of doing certain repairs today, and a large insurer's network rule did the same in the most recent version of it we could find, an undated page whose deadlines fall in 2017 and 2018. None of the documents imposing it says what it costs. Who ends up paying for it is a question we cannot answer, and the tax return of the body that issues the credential is built in a way that cannot answer it either.

By Anthony Braswell for Quorum Industries LLC, The Autobody Directory · Updated 2026-09-06 · How this was written, and what the machine may not do

How this page was produced: Researched, drafted and checked with AI assistance under human direction, and signed off by the named author. How this site is written

The requirement is written down, and it comes from more than one direction

American Honda's collision certification terms and conditions are a public PDF. We opened it on 2026-09-05 [COMPANY]. To be certified, a shop must "Be an I-CAR Gold Class Professionals(R) shop". Beyond that, "one (1) structural collision repair technician or non-structural collision repair technician must complete and pass the ST035L01 M.I.G. Brazing Hands-On Skill Development course offered by I-CAR."

Read that second clause slowly. A manufacturer's contract names a third party's catalogue course code as a compliance obligation. The shop discharges the duty by buying one identified course from one identified vendor.

The obligation does not end at entry. Among the enumerated events that end a shop's place in the programme is "The Shop fails to maintain its I-CAR Gold Class(R) status", and the contract's stated standard for termination is that it happens "as determined by American Honda in its sole discretion". Letting the credential lapse is written into the agreement as a ground for losing the certification, which puts a renewal date on the expense.

The document prices exactly one thing, and it prices it annually. "The initial participation fee for the Program (the 'Participation Fee') is $3,300 for the Shop's first year in the Program, due and payable at a specified time prior to beginning the Shop's first certification process." Renewal costs the same: "Subsequently, upon invitation by American Honda to recertify for an additional year, the Participation Fee is $3,300." We then asked the document directly whether any dollar figure appears anywhere in it for I-CAR training, courses or Gold Class status. None does.

A second manufacturer requires the same body's credential in its own programme standard. I-CAR's page for the Tesla programme, read 2026-09-05 [COMPANY], says the Tesla Approved Collision Center programme "requires completion of I-CAR's Training and Certification: Aluminum GMA (MIG) Welding and Training and Certification: Steel GMA Welding for every facility", that a facility doing structural repairs must maintain two technicians certified in each, and that "Welding certifications must be renewed every three years." No price appears on that page.

And a party that does not build cars requires it too. BodyShop Business, in a report on State Farm's Select Service network rule [REPORTED], listed "Completion of Steel GMA (MIG) Welding (WCS03) and Steel Sectioning (SPS05) by the end of 2017. Completion of Aluminum GMA (MIG) Welding (WCA03) completed by March 31, 2018", with "at least one technician" at facilities of ten technicians or fewer and "at least two technicians" at facilities of eleven or more. The two welding courses there carry the same names as the two in the Tesla requirement. No publication date was printed on the page we read; the deadlines put it around 2017, and we did not test whether the rule still stands in 2026.

So the same credential is made a condition of work by a carmaker's contract, a carmaker's programme standard, and an insurer's network rule. It converges on the shop from several directions at once, and each direction is silent about the bill.

The price, insofar as anyone has published one

I-CAR did put subscription figures into public view once. Repairer Driven News, 23 August 2018, reported "$229 per location" per month plus "$35 per relevant staffer (estimators, structural, nonstructural techs and painters)" [REPORTED]. That is eight years old and should not be read as current pricing.

One structural detail from that reporting has not aged, though. The subscription route was closed to shops that had not yet reached Gold Class: "I-CAR strategic development Vice President Ann Gonzalez said Aug. 8 the rationale for excluding non-Gold shops from the subscription option was that they each had a different amount of training to do." Whatever the numbers are now, the flat-rate route through the gate was, at that time, available only to shops already through it. Whether it worked out cheaper than buying courses one at a time is not something the reporting says.

What the filed return shows

I-CAR is a 501(c)(6) business league. We read its record on ProPublica's nonprofit API on 2026-09-05 [COMPANY, filed return]. EIN 36-3117579, tax period 202312: total revenue $75,101,421; contributions and grants $0; program service revenue $72,366,559; total assets $121,108,345.

That zero is the interesting figure. In that tax period the entity that issues Gold Class booked no gift income at all. Almost everything else it took in, it earned by selling something: $72,366,559 of program service revenue out of $75,101,421. The remaining $2,734,862 came from the market rather than from any payer, as investment income of $2,671,413, net securities gains of $60,052 and $3,397 of other revenue.

What the filed return cannot show

On that return, a sponsor's payment and the tuition of a shop with no choice land on the same line and cannot be told apart.

That is how the form works. A Form 990 revenue line reports what money was earned for, not who handed it over, and this page makes no claim that I-CAR is hiding anything by filing an ordinary return in the ordinary way. We found no schedule, segment note or public statement in reach that breaks the $72.4M down by type of payer.

That single fact governs everything a reader might want to conclude from here, and it cuts both ways.

We do not claim that shops fund the gate. The best-known figure pointing that way is from January 2018, when Repairer Driven News reported that "83 percent of I-CAR's funding comes from auto body shops paying tuition" [REPORTED]. It is trade press, it is eight years old, and it is a single statement with no audited breakdown behind it. It cannot stand in for the payer split the return does not contain.

We are not saying that manufacturers pay little or nothing toward the training they require. Evidence of manufacturer money running to I-CAR is right there in the Honda contract we opened: one of the listed programme benefits is "Free access to a Collision Tech-Line through I-CAR", which is a service somebody is paying for. Our earlier research also recorded a report of Ford co-developing On-Target courses with I-CAR (Autobody News, January 2026; not re-opened for this page). Manufacturer money of that kind would land in the same undifferentiated revenue line as a compelled shop's tuition, and would be exactly as invisible.

Who stands beside the gate

What can be counted is who I-CAR names as its Sustaining Partners. On 2026-09-05, its partner index sorted them into four categories of its own devising. Under the heading "OEMs" were five names: Ford, Jaguar, LUCID, Nissan, Volvo. The Insurers category on the same page carried a stated count of 26 while actually listing 29 names, among them Allstate, State Farm, USAA, Farmers, American Family, Kemper, and three AAA-affiliated entries: AAA Auto Club Enterprises, AAA Auto Club Group and CSAA.

Treat every one of those numbers as a floor rather than a count. The page's own subtotal disagrees with the names it prints, and our earlier testing found BMW, a member since 2023, present at its own per-partner page and absent from the index entirely. The index is not a census.

We are not putting a multiple on the difference between those two headings, because the numbers cannot carry one. The only category we have tested for completeness is the automakers, and it failed, so the short list is the one we know is short. We have not tested the insurer list at all. The headings are also I-CAR's own, and the insurer heading covers claims and fleet-service businesses such as Alacrity Solutions, CEI, Holman, IAnet, Innovation Group North America and Spark Underwriters alongside carriers. Two further categories, Suppliers with twenty-four names and Information Providers with fourteen, are larger than the automakers and go uncounted here.

Even a sound count would not be a measure of money. I-CAR publishes no tier schedule and no per-partner amount, so a headcount of logos tells you who is willing to be listed, not who wrote the largest cheque.

We looked for Honda and Tesla on that roster and did not find them, at the index or at the per-partner address pattern that works for Ford and BMW. Those were constructed addresses, and a guessed address that returns nothing is a failed guess rather than a proof of absence. Neither manufacturer is visible as a sponsor by any route we tried.

That is a fact about the roster and not about the money. Honda is absent from the roster, and Honda's own contract lists free access to a Collision Tech-Line through I-CAR among the programme's benefits, which is a service somebody is paying for. Sponsorship is one visible channel, and this page has already found manufacturer money outside it.

There is real donated money in this industry, and it is worth seeing where it goes. The affiliated I-CAR Education Foundation, EIN 36-3768028, read on 2026-09-05 [COMPANY, filed return], booked $20,373,241 of contributions for the same tax period against program service revenue of $0. Roughly $20M a year of gifts enters the group, into the entity that books no sales at all and issues no credential. The Foundation is a 501(c)(3) and I-CAR is a 501(c)(6), which is the mechanism by which gifts can enter one and not the other. What the Foundation then does with the money is something the record we read does not say.

The strongest case that this arrangement is fine

The credential is portable, and that matters. The same two welding certifications satisfy a Tesla programme requirement and an insurer's network rule, so a shop buys once and presents the result at several gates. Five proprietary curricula from five carmakers would cost far more.

The shop also keeps what it bought. A technician who can weld high-strength steel is more valuable whether or not any manufacturer asks again, and the certificate stays with the shop when the programme relationship ends.

The sponsor programme's stated purpose, in the same 2018 reporting this page draws on, was to reduce what shops pay: I-CAR "was seeking corporate sponsors to sign on as 'Sustaining Partners' and make training cheaper for collision repairers and vocational schools" [REPORTED]. There was an observable mechanism behind that in the same reporting. Select Service members "will be eligible for I-CAR's Pro Pricing program, which provides a 10 percent discount on the required training programs", and State Farm's Justin Tomczak gave as a reason for choosing I-CAR that "it has the largest network of instructors to deliver training and because of the financial benefit it provides our network facilities" [REPORTED]. On that reading, an insurer-heavy sponsor roster is money moving toward shops. We did not test whether either arrangement survives into 2026.

None of those three points touches the two hardest facts. The contract makes loss of the credential a ground for termination and states no price for it, and the credentialing body's contributions line is zero.

What we could not verify

What you can actually do with this

If you are a shop about to sign a certification agreement, price the credential before you sign, because the agreement will not price it for you. Get a current quote for the exact course codes the agreement names, ask whether any network you already belong to has a pricing arrangement, and budget the whole thing as a cost that comes back on every renewal cycle.

If you are a customer looking at a certification plaque on the wall, the honest reading is narrow. The badge is not a warranty. It is a record that somebody at that shop bought training and keeps buying it. Honda's contract is explicit that the shop "remains fully responsible for all repairs, services and other work that it performs and shall not state, suggest or imply to customers or others that American Honda warrants or assumes any responsibility for any such repairs, services and other work."

Corrections

Two errors in our own working notes were caught while checking quotations for this page, before publication.

Our notes dated the Repairer Driven News subscription-pricing article 8 August 2018 and gave its figures as $230 per month per shop and $35 per technician, yielding $6,540 a year for an average shop. The article is dated 23 August 2018; "Aug. 8" is a date inside it. The figures it prints are "$229 per location" and "$35 per relevant staffer", and no annual total for an average shop appears in it. The derived annual figure and a paraphrased sentence about non-Gold shops were both cut from this page and replaced with what the article actually says.

Our notes carried I-CAR's FY2023 return at second hand from an earlier read. We re-opened the record directly on 2026-09-05 and it reproduced field for field.

Eight further changes were made to the draft after an internal review.

A draft sentence read "Nobody funds the entity that issues Gold Class by gift. Every dollar it takes in, it takes in by selling something to somebody." The second half is false as filed. Program service revenue is $72,366,559 of $75,101,421; the balance is investment income and securities gains, which have no payer at all. The figures replaced the sentence.

A draft compared five automakers with twenty-nine insurers and called the difference "roughly fivefold". Both terms are floors, the only category ever tested for completeness is the automakers and it failed on the small side, the headings are I-CAR's own and not like populations, and two larger categories went uncounted. The multiple was dropped.

A draft read "Neither manufacturer is visible as a sponsor by any route we tried, while both make the credential a condition of certification." The concessive "while" invited a conclusion about who pays that this page's own evidence forbids, since the Honda contract quoted here shows manufacturer money reaching I-CAR outside the sponsor roster. The sentence was split and the inference closed off in the paragraph that follows it.

A draft quoted the $3,300 Honda participation fee and glossed it as a first-year figure. The same document sets the recertification fee at $3,300 as well. The renewal sentence was added, because a shop budgeting from this page would otherwise read the fee as one-time.

A draft said the Education Foundation "funds schools and students". Nothing we read supports that purpose claim. It was replaced with the tax-status mechanism, which is sourced, and the gap was added to the list above.

A draft called the 2018 subscription option the "cheaper" route through the gate. The reporting establishes that it was flat-rate and closed to non-Gold shops, and prints no comparison with buying courses one at a time. The word was changed and the missing comparison stated.

A draft's short answer put the State Farm requirement in the present tense alongside the two manufacturer requirements. That leg rests on an undated page whose deadlines fall in 2017 and 2018. The tense was scoped to what we checked.

A draft counted "both large AAA clubs". The index lists three AAA-affiliated entries.

Sources

General consumer information: not legal, insurance, or financial advice. Requirements, coverage, and practices vary by state, policy, and manufacturer.

Run a body shop? Your shop likely already has a page here, built from public records. Check it and claim it free: verifying only ever adds.
What does claiming add? It's free ›

Where this fits

Each link says what it is for. We add one only when a reader on this page has a real reason to need that page next.